[Oorexx-devel] V4.1

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
Hi, I have rexx installed in /opt/ooRexx. In /usr/bin if have a symlink to /opt/ooRexx/bin/rexx. /opt/ooRexx/bin is not in my $PATH, and /opt/ooRexx/lib is not in my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH. In /opt/ooRexx/bin there are numerous *.cls files. I guess my question is how does ooRexx find these class

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Mime-Types

2010-08-20 Thread Erico Mendonca
>>> On 8/20/2010 at 01:26 PM, in message <4c6eaca2.7070...@wu-wien.ac.at>, >>> "Rony G. Flatscher" wrote: > Am still trying to finalize the installation/uninstallation scripts with > desktop integration, to achieve a single double-click install and an > uninstall via menus (just learned all

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Erico Mendonca
>>> On 8/20/2010 at 12:01 PM, in message <4c6e98b0.6090...@gmail.com>, David Ashley wrote: > I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is > maintained by hand. I modify them as necessary manually in the old rpm spec > file > (about lines 59-65). I am probably

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Mime-Types

2010-08-20 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Erico, On 20.08.2010 18:07, Erico Mendonca wrote: On 8/19/2010 at 05:24 PM, in message <4c6d92f1.6090...@wu-wien.ac.at>, "Rony G. > Flatscher" wrote: > >> Thank you all very much for your kind help! >> >> Just stumbled over "xdg-open" which is available on the n

[Oorexx-devel] Mime-Types (was: alternatives for gnome-open)

2010-08-20 Thread Erico Mendonca
>>> On 8/19/2010 at 05:24 PM, in message <4c6d92f1.6090...@wu-wien.ac.at>, >>> "Rony G. Flatscher" wrote: > Thank you all very much for your kind help! > > Just stumbled over "xdg-open" which is available on the newer Linux > systems (part of the xdg-utils). > > ---rony > By the way,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
Yes I was referring to build time, when I need the information to create the input files for installer package creation. The installer package needs the information to create the appropriate symlinks. Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:01 AM,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:01 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is > maintained by hand. But, you can when you're building, which is what I think / thought Bruce was concerned with. In general: Any of the beta or release branches w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread David Ashley
I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is maintained by hand. I modify them as necessary manually in the old rpm spec file (about lines 59-65). I am probably the only person on the team that understands how these numbers should be maintained so that linking wor

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
So the current library version number should be $(ORX_CURRENT).$(ORX_AGE).$(ORX_REVISION) Thanks, Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, CVBruce wrote: >> Ok, I didn't know that. It complicates the install - uninstall >> process a bit. Wher

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, CVBruce wrote: > Ok, I didn't know that.  It complicates the install - uninstall > process a bit.  Where can I determine the current release version > numbers for the libraries? You could read it from oorexx.ver: # This defines the oorexx library version. For ooR

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
Ok, I didn't know that. It complicates the install - uninstall process a bit. Where can I determine the current release version numbers for the libraries? Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:31 AM, David Ashley wrote: > Library versioning on Linux have absolutely nothing to do with the > product

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread David Ashley
Library versioning on Linux have absolutely nothing to do with the product version. It is a completely different versioning scheme. David Ashley On 08/19/2010 05:21 PM, CVBruce wrote: > Hi, > > I just built ooRexx of off the main trunk. > > The version of ooRexx built was 4.1.0, but the librar

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6124] main/trunk/platform/unix/macosx/PackageInfo.in

2010-08-20 Thread David Ashley
You have to sign up for it. David Ashley On 08/19/2010 05:03 PM, CVBruce wrote: I guess I'm still not on the oorexx-svn list. Bruce Begin forwarded message: *From: *oorexx-svn-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net *Date: *August 19, 2010 3:00:09 PM PD