Thanks,
I'll take care of it.
Jon
On 11 June 2014 18:35, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I'm okay with adding the sample. Note that the rest of Rick's advice is
> pertinent.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Rick McGuire
> wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>>
>> You'll need to
Jon,
I'm okay with adding the sample. Note that the rest of Rick's advice is
pertinent.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Rick McGuire
wrote:
> Jon,
>
> You'll need to get Rony's permission, but I'm ok with that. Note that we
> generally don't include author information in
Jon,
You'll need to get Rony's permission, but I'm ok with that. Note that we
generally don't include author information in the code, so you'll need to
clean that sort of stuff up, although I would not be adverse to adding a
"originally contributed by" notice.
Rick
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:26
Hi Rick,
glad to see this one. I always wondered who created classes on the fly. I
say get rid of it.
I'd like to add Rony's singleton meta-class and use_singleton script to the
samples. Is that OK?
Jon
On 11 June 2014 18:05, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> I say go for it. Whatever you think is
I've been going through the samples and modernizing some of these samples.
One of the samples, factor.rex, demonstrates some features that are really
features I would hope that no programmer would ever use because the
language directives are really the way to go. I'd like to delete this
one...any
I say go for it. Whatever you think is useful, go ahead and do it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rick McGuire
wrote:
> I've been going through the samples and modernizing some of these samples.
> One of the samples, factor.rex, demonstrates some features that are really
All -
I have converted about 30% of the VMs on the Build Machine to use the
new CMake build system we have been working on. Unfortunately. we will
not be able to convert much more than that because a lot of the older
VMs do not have an up-to-date CMake version and can not build ooRexx
successfully
