No.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:43 AM J Leslie Turriff
wrote:
> On 2021-10-30 10:31:59 Rick McGuire wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Erich Steinböck
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > can I reuse fileStream somehow? There seems to be no way to associate
> > >
> > >> fileStream with a different
On 2021-10-30 10:31:59 Rick McGuire wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Erich Steinböck
>
>
> wrote:
> > can I reuse fileStream somehow? There seems to be no way to associate
> >
> >> fileStream with a different file
> >
> > Hi Leslie,
> > in fact this can be done by calling INIT directly.
On 31.10.2021 13:20, Rick McGuire wrote:
> It's a bug in your program. This is an UNKNOWN method, so the arguments to
> the method are the
> message name and an array of arguments to the original message. Using the
> default ARGUMENTS value
> will pass those along as the arguments, which is not l
It's a bug in your program. This is an UNKNOWN method, so the arguments to
the method are the message name and an array of arguments to the original
message. Using the default ARGUMENTS value will pass those along as the
arguments, which is not likely to be valid for what you are trying to do.
The
The documentation to FORWARD (cf. "2.8. FORWARD") states among other things:
If you specify neither ARGUMENTS nor ARRAY, the language processor uses the
same arguments
specified on the original method call.
In the following UNKNOWN method the forward keyword statements do not contain
AR
