Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rick McGuire
It looks like the _DEBUG_ flag is only getting set for the Windows build and not the others. This is likely a CmakeList.txt problem that effects more than just rexx -v. Rick On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:27 AM P.O. Jonsson wrote: > The same for me on NetBSD, no information on build type ( > -DCMAKE

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread P.O. Jonsson
The same for me on NetBSD, no information on build type (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELWITHDEBINFO) Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r12326 Build date: Nov 29 2021 Addressing mode: 64 Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 2005-2021 Rexx Language Association. All right

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 29.11.2021 14:38, Rick McGuire wrote: > rexx -v already includes the information "Internal Test Version" for debug > builds. Including it > there would be much preferred over exposing it as a language feature. We > don't do undocument > language features. Double checked a Linux debug build (r

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rick McGuire
rexx -v already includes the information "Internal Test Version" for debug builds. Including it there would be much preferred over exposing it as a language feature. We don't do undocument language features. Rick On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:19 AM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 29.11.2021 13:59, Ri

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 29.11.2021 13:59, Rick McGuire wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea to have a language feature that is so tightly > coupled to the tool > used to build the interpreter. Tools change, but language features are > forever. Also, using the > CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE for the value makes it almost imposs

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread P.O. Jonsson
Is there any other way to find out? I also have this need occasionally Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson oor...@jonases.se > Am 29.11.2021 um 13:59 schrieb Rick McGuire : > > I don't think it's a good idea to have a language feature that is so tightly > coupled to the tool used to build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rick McGuire
I don't think it's a good idea to have a language feature that is so tightly coupled to the tool used to build the interpreter. Tools change, but language features are forever. Also, using the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE for the value makes it almost impossible to document the return values, since with CMAKE,

[Oorexx-devel] RFC: "config" method for .RexxInfo

2021-11-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
In the past days I have been creating and testing various versions of ooRexx on various systems and have been using .RexxInfo to check about revisions and bitnesses. Unfortunately, .RexxInfo does not have a method "config" that would return "release", "debug" or "relwithdebinfo", depending on ho

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Tomcat on Linux with ooRexx server pages

2021-11-29 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Tested r12326 in the "debug" configuration which did not change the behavior. Spending quite some time on it a few corrections/remarks: * It seems that the number of successful requests depends on the ooRexx configuration, whether it is "debug" or "release". The "debug" version has about 5