On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:25 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> On 16.07.2022 17:18, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious
> performance implications and will only be misused by people who don't
> understand how garbage collection works. There, you
On 16.07.2022 17:18, Rick McGuire wrote:
I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious performance implications and
will only be misused by people who don't understand how garbage collection works. There, you no
longer need to worry about silent assent.
Indeed.
So, Rick,
I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious
performance implications and will only be misused by people who don't
understand how garbage collection works. There, you no longer need to worry
about silent assent.
Rick
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
While debugging (for almost two months) ooRexx and BSF4ooRexx/Java it was almost impossible to
determine the source of some memory leaks.
The reason was not being able to rely on the garbage collector having run at a specific point in
time such that all objects that have no references anymore g
