Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad Activity::activationFrames and asynchronous message

2024-07-13 Thread Rick McGuire
That makes absolutely no sense. Once the new activity is started, there is no guarantee that the stackframe or even the activity from which it was spawned even exists any more. The original activity has continued on doing its own stuff. Rick On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 11:09 AM Rony G. Flatscher wr

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad Activity::activationFrames and asynchronous message

2024-07-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 13.07.2024 16:27, Rick McGuire wrote: the stackframes are a representation of the activations active on an activity. When a method is started asynchronously, it is the base of the activity stack and does not have a parent stack frame. So many other things would get messed up by trying to add

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad Activity::activationFrames and asynchronous message

2024-07-13 Thread Rick McGuire
the stackframes are a representation of the activations active on an activity. When a method is started asynchronously, it is the base of the activity stack and does not have a parent stack frame. So many other things would get messed up by trying to add one to that stack. And you're on your own wi

[Oorexx-devel] Question ad Activity::activationFrames and asynchronous message

2024-07-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
While analyzing various invocation types and the caller's stack frame (for invocation entries to allow identifying the caller from a trace log later), everything seems to work out nicely. There is one case where the caller's stack frame cannot be generated, it seems to have to do with methods t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Version 2 (Re: Ad rules for running guarded methods (Re: A question about the blocking of a particular method

2024-07-13 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Planning on adding the documentation at the end of section "12.4.3. Guarded Methods" in rexxref.pdf. --- Planning on the following improvements for TraceObject: * add an entry ISWAITING for "GUARD ON|OFF WHEN condition" statements, reflecting the state of the evaluated condition; if condi

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Short info on Jenkins

2024-07-13 Thread René Jansen
No problem P.O., it is all for the better. René. > On 13 Jul 2024, at 11:34, ooRexx wrote: > > The migration from macOS Catalina to Sonoma did not go so well after all. > After a while all VMs crashed, possibly because of a disk was filling up to > much. In the end I had to reinstall the mach

[Oorexx-devel] Short info on Jenkins

2024-07-13 Thread ooRexx
The migration from macOS Catalina to Sonoma did not go so well after all. After a while all VMs crashed, possibly because of a disk was filling up to much. In the end I had to reinstall the machine from zero and delete the previous Jenkins user. As a result I need to get all VMs back from the ba