Well it looks like I've create 3 working versions of ooRexx, one each
architecture in i386, x86_64, and ppc. They all pass testOORexx.rex.
I haven't been able to make a ppc64 version yet. Not sure why.
The question I have is this.
I can make three different installer packages, or I could
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Well it looks like I've create 3 working versions of ooRexx, one each
architecture in i386, x86_64, and ppc. They all pass testOORexx.rex.
I haven't been able to make a ppc64 version yet. Not sure why.
The question I have is
If you've had problems in the past with people getting the wrong
version, then I agree universal would be the way to go. Let the
operating system figure out which on it wants to run. It would also
benefit those that have to install on many machines, just one install
method.
I'll start
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The question I have is this.
I can make three different installer packages, or I could make one
universal binary installer package. What do you think
