Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
, Birmingham Road, Warwick, CV34 5JL Rick McGuire wrote on 27/04/2009 20:16:03: > Rick McGuire > 27/04/2009 20:16 > > Please respond to > Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List > > To > > Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List > > cc > > Sub

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Rick McGuire
Most of the commits in that range were to the branch where I tried replacing the the C runtime functions with native ones. Add to that the fact we're updating both the trunk and beta branch with all bug fixes, the commit numbers ratchet up pretty quickly. However, it looks like the version that M

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
> The only other difference between 4507 and 4523 is the fix for > SysFileSearch(). Nothing at all related to rxapi. Sorry ... I meant Rexx APIs, not rxapi. I have exactly one call to SysFileSearch in all my Rexx programs, and definitely nowhere near the failing case (in fact I don't even remem

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Rick McGuire
The only other difference between 4507 and 4523 is the fix for SysFileSearch(). Nothing at all related to rxapi. Rick On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > OK, here's update ... > >> I think Mike and I might have got crossed up by slow e-mails. >> (Maybe.)  His subject title

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
OK, here's update ... > I think Mike and I might have got crossed up by slow e-mails. > (Maybe.) His subject title says 4521. But, the build with your fix > in it was 4523. > > Anyhow, I pointed him to a 4523 build that is a fresh check out from > the beta branch, rather than a build from my tr

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, I think Mike and I might have got crossed up by slow e-mails. (Maybe.) His subject title says 4521. But, the build with your fix in it was 4523. Anyhow, I pointed him to a 4523 build that is a fresh check out from the beta branch, rather than a build from my trunk. That way we can be sur

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > Something else changed between these builds ... now the first time GoServe > calls Rexx it works fine, but on the second call it crashes with a C05 Mike, I did the build from trunk, rather than the beta source tree. Let me get you a b

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Rick McGuire
This could conceivably be caused by the same change, but I'm probably going to need something to recreate this so I can debug. Rick On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > > Something else changed between these builds ... now the first time GoServe > calls Rexx it works fine, b

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 -> 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
Something else changed between these builds ... now the first time GoServe calls Rexx it works fine, but on the second call it crashes with a C05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mike Cowlishaw, IBM Fellow http://bit.ly/mfc IBM UK (MP8), PO Box 31,