Well, Jean-Louis exploring the car dealer application has turned into
a profitable exercise for me. 3 starred posts from Rick.
For the record, Rick's fix did indeed fix the problem.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The use of the behaviour field depends
The use of the behaviour field depends on the type of class. If you
look in PrimitiveClasses.xml, you'll see there are 3 categories of
classes: Exported, Internal, and Transient. For Internal and
Transient classes, the behaviour field is pretty much limited to class
identity. For Exported class
Rick,
Thanks for the good explanation. Ties together a few things I see in
the code, but was a little hazy about.
For the behaviour field. Is its sole purpose to aid in the
unflattening process? Or does it come into play during execution?
I'll take a closer look at rexxc, but it seems like this
And now for the long-winded explanation for why this problem was
occurring. All of the objects that get allocated from the Rexx heap
are C++ methods, which means they have a hidden first field that is
the virtual function pointer for the object. Internally, ooRexx uses
a lot of C++ polymorphism f
I'm about 99% certain I just fixed this (a 1-character change :-) ).
I suspect you'll need to rebuild everything to get this change to
work.
Rick
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand what's need
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what's needed to reproduce this problem.
> The appropriate place to start debugging this would be to set a
> breakpoint on RexxActivity::raiseException() to see where the error is
> issued from.
Thanks Rick. You had
I'm not sure I understand what's needed to reproduce this problem.
The appropriate place to start debugging this would be to set a
breakpoint on RexxActivity::raiseException() to see where the error is
issued from.
Rick
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
>
>> I tested the car dealer application with ooRexx-4.0.0 under Windows XP.
...
>> Error 93 running C:\tmp\do Rexx\CARDEAL\OOD\ood.mrg line 109: Incorrect
>> call to method
>> Error
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
> I tested the car dealer application with ooRexx-4.0.0 under Windows XP.
> Download application from
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg244825.html
> (additional material)
>
> I tested :
> car-run F A
> car-run F G
>
> When running
Hi,
I tested the car dealer application with ooRexx-4.0.0 under Windows XP.
Download application from
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg244825.html
(additional material)
I tested :
car-run F A
car-run F G
When running from sources (i.e. tokenized files replaced by source files),
everythi
10 matches
Mail list logo
