Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > just a very brief/quick feedback, Hi Rony, Thanks for the feedback. I'm not going to address the points individually, just giving an update here. The 'Send To' idea is good, I've added that. The user can choose to create a Send To i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote: > I thought about rewriting bits of it as I am accustom to if statements > rather than what amounts to gotos. For me it helps in readability to > have the logic library available. From the new installer, it looks like > you agree. Yes, using

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-24 Thread Brandon Cherry
Maybe the simple fix would be to default each of the following extension dialogs to the one selected in the previous one (.rexg and .rexp defaults to what was selected in .rex). That way I do not have to browse for each one, unless there is a specific reason I would want to do that. -- Brandon

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-24 Thread Brandon Cherry
Thanks Mark! Brilliant work on the installer. I thought about rewriting bits of it as I am accustom to if statements rather than what amounts to gotos. For me it helps in readability to have the logic library available. From the new installer, it looks like you agree. One question quickly come

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
All, I placed Windows installation packages on the build machine: http://build.oorexx.org/builds/interpreter-main/6209/windows/ There are 32-bit and 64-bit builds of 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, both debug and non-debug versions. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote: > S

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-22 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 22.09.2010 21:42, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > .orx is fine (is in my list). I don't understand .cls (lots of OO > languages have classes, or clear screens). If you check out the distributed files and Rexx packages, then you'll see that many of them carry the extension ".cls". If you look at the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-22 Thread Lee Peedin
thodology advert format...) > :-)? > Mike > > > *From:* Rony G. Flatscher [mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at] > *Sent:* 22 September 2010 18:15 > *To:* Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [Oorexx-devel] En

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-22 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program On 19.09.2010 15:34, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > Would also associate in addition all other regular Rexx > extensions like ".rexx", ".cls", ".orx", ".testGroup&

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-22 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 19.09.2010 15:34, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > > Would also associate in addition all other regular Rexx > > extensions like ".rexx", ".cls", ".orx", ".testGroup", ".testUnit", > which all > > are in use in the Rexx world. > > .rexx and .orx .. maybe .. but the others just seem to be "grabbi

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-21 Thread David Ashley
I can give access to the build machine for anyone that want to place ooRexx builds on it. Just send me a note and I will explain how to accomplish it. It will require ssh/scp to move the file to the server. David Ashley On 09/21/2010 11:56 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote: > Seeing how the build serv

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote: > Seeing how the build server is down for windows builds for the time > being, is there an alternative location for at least a 32 bit build? If David sends me the details on to access the build machine, I could drop a Windows 32-bit and 64 b

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-21 Thread Brandon Cherry
Seeing how the build server is down for windows builds for the time being, is there an alternative location for at least a 32 bit build? -- Brandon Cherry On 9/18/2010 3:08 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > All, > > I've committed a rewritten NSIS script to trunk and 4.1.0. This > script is what creat

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-19 Thread Mike Cowlishaw
> Would also associate in addition all other regular Rexx > extensions like ".rexx", ".cls", ".orx", ".testGroup", ".testUnit", which all > are in use in the Rexx world. .rexx and .orx .. maybe .. but the others just seem to be "grabbing extensions" -- particularly for most installers? Mi

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-19 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Mark, just a very brief/quick feedback, being on the run to a GSE-workshop in Frankfurt taking the night train... On 18.09.2010 21:08, Mark Miesfeld wrote: ... cut ... > 2.) The installation lets the user pick their own file associations, > or not do any file associations at all. In additi

[Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
All, I've committed a rewritten NSIS script to trunk and 4.1.0. This script is what creates the Windows installation program, so essentially it is an updated installation program. I'm planning on using it for 4.1.0, so I'd like to explain the changes and start to get feed back now. There are 2