Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Erico Mendonca
>>> On 8/20/2010 at 12:01 PM, in message <4c6e98b0.6090...@gmail.com>, David Ashley wrote: > I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is > maintained by hand. I modify them as necessary manually in the old rpm spec > file > (about lines 59-65). I am probably

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
Yes I was referring to build time, when I need the information to create the input files for installer package creation. The installer package needs the information to create the appropriate symlinks. Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:01 AM,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:01 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is > maintained by hand. But, you can when you're building, which is what I think / thought Bruce was concerned with. In general: Any of the beta or release branches w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread David Ashley
I am not really sure you can at install time. This version information is maintained by hand. I modify them as necessary manually in the old rpm spec file (about lines 59-65). I am probably the only person on the team that understands how these numbers should be maintained so that linking wor

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
So the current library version number should be $(ORX_CURRENT).$(ORX_AGE).$(ORX_REVISION) Thanks, Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, CVBruce wrote: >> Ok, I didn't know that. It complicates the install - uninstall >> process a bit. Wher

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, CVBruce wrote: > Ok, I didn't know that.  It complicates the install - uninstall > process a bit.  Where can I determine the current release version > numbers for the libraries? You could read it from oorexx.ver: # This defines the oorexx library version. For ooR

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread CVBruce
Ok, I didn't know that. It complicates the install - uninstall process a bit. Where can I determine the current release version numbers for the libraries? Bruce On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:31 AM, David Ashley wrote: > Library versioning on Linux have absolutely nothing to do with the > product

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread David Ashley
Library versioning on Linux have absolutely nothing to do with the product version. It is a completely different versioning scheme. David Ashley On 08/19/2010 05:21 PM, CVBruce wrote: > Hi, > > I just built ooRexx of off the main trunk. > > The version of ooRexx built was 4.1.0, but the librar

[Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-19 Thread CVBruce
Hi, I just built ooRexx of off the main trunk. The version of ooRexx built was 4.1.0, but the libraries are 4.0.2. Bruce -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry De