Hi P.O.,
On 26.01.2023 21:58, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
Am 26.01.2023 um 11:48 schrieb René Jansen :
I have lightly tested the s390x portable build under docker versions of s390x/ubuntu and
s390x/almalinux - both work. I think that we even can remove the ‘ubuntu’ segment of the name of
the zip
Hi René,
> Am 26.01.2023 um 11:48 schrieb René Jansen :
>
> I have lightly tested the s390x portable build under docker versions of
> s390x/ubuntu and s390x/almalinux - both work. I think that we even can remove
> the ‘ubuntu’ segment of the name of the zip that contains the portable
>
I have lightly tested the s390x portable build under docker versions of
s390x/ubuntu and s390x/almalinux - both work. I think that we even can remove
the ‘ubuntu’ segment of the name of the zip that contains the portable version.
Next step should probably be to get the ooRexx builds in the
> On 24. Jan 2023, at 12:44, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> P.O.,
>
> this is *really* great, super!
>
> Just a question: would it be possible for you to also create the portable
> versions for 5.0.0 for s390x (and all other platforms)?
>
>
Rony - I anticipated your question and built the
P.O.,
this is *really* great, super!
Just a question: would it be possible for you to also create the portable versions for 5.0.0 for
s390x (and all other platforms)?
---
Ad failing test: that looks strange. If you repeat the tests, does it re-occur?
Here the testmethod from test/trunk:
The IBMZ Agent (René's IBM LinuxONE Rockhopper with Ubuntu 18.04.5) was
available again temporarily so I took the opportunity to make a retrospekive
build for 5.0.0:
ooRexx-5.0.0-12583.ubuntu1804.s390x.deb
I have also built for the latest 5.1.0 these items:
