Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-23 Thread David Ashley
The make rpm process does not include the bootstrap file. Mostly as a oversite. bootstrap is not really necessary unless you have to make changes to the configure.ac file. And this is what I want to experiment with for the s390 builds. I now have access to a 64 bit and a 31 bit s390 system. I w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, David Ashley wrote: > When you put the source together (the zip and tar file) for the rc3 drop > be sure that you include a copy of the bootstrap script. I will need > this to do the build on s390 systems. Post the source on SF as soon as > it is available so I can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-23 Thread David Ashley
Mark - When you put the source together (the zip and tar file) for the rc3 drop be sure that you include a copy of the bootstrap script. I will need this to do the build on s390 systems. Post the source on SF as soon as it is available so I can start building the s390 rpms. Thanks David Ashley

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, that pretty much coincides with what I was thinking. Why don't we make a new release available over the weekend. If no more bugs are opened in the next couple of days, then early in the weekend. If some bugs are opened and we are working on them then the later part of the weekend. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-22 Thread Rick McGuire
The memory leak issue I fixed was also more significant that I would have liked. I suspect it is time for an RC3 release. We've also suddenly picked up some new people who've been kicking the tires and opening bug reports. As much as I'd like to say it's time, I think we need at least one more r

[Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick's comment to bug 2825120 Rexx bad -arguments not rejected clarified the one lingering issue I saw (thanks Rick.) So, I'm wondering where we are at now? I saw the relative path issue on Linux as being more than a trivial thing. Do we need to do another release build? Wait a little while an