David Ruggles wrote:
I'm not here to argue which one is correct (I'm sure Linux is) However, it's
not working even in accordance with what's documented.
Excuse me for misunderstanding your problem. I thought you were troubled
merely w/r/t the skew
between L and W.
Do you have a copy of ?
A MCSE (NT) CNA A+
Network EngineerSafe Data, Inc.
(910) 285-7200 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 2:36 PM
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Sockets on Linux (r
David Ruggles wrote:
> As I mentioned before Linux seems to treat sockets differently then windows.
>
No, Windows treats sockets differently than Linux, always has, and has
often been wrong
thereby. The crappy Redmond implementation in NT throughout the 1990's
helped create a
wider market for
As I mentioned before Linux seems to treat sockets differently then windows.
In continuing my testing I've stumbled upon a new issue.
Since I wasn't able to get the timeout to work on either platform, I
modified the server code to create a socket and connect to itself to
shutdown. This works on bo
