Marking the source tar file is better than marking an old version IMHO.
Sent from an undisclosed location.
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> It is possible to specify which file will be displayed as a default for
> different systems. The available systems are Windows, Lin
It is possible to specify which file will be displayed as a default for
different systems. The available systems are Windows, Linux, Mac/OS, and
Solaris. So, the real question is which of the different flavors should we
mark as the default download for Linux? Likely none of them are correct
for
What package extension is shown on the package it selects for you. Is it
picking a 32 or 64 bit package? Is there a prebuilt package for your OS in the
list of packages for the new release?
Sent from an undisclosed location.
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Michael Lueck
> wrote:
>
> Greetin
Greetings,
The front page / summary tab of the SF ooRexx project still suggests to
download ooRexx 4.1.0
Re: Download Stats: I will promptly download the official builds for OS/3
(Linux), and also legacy operating systems! ;-)
Blessings,
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckda
Greetings Bruce,
CVBruce wrote:
> Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place I
> see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using.
Yes, I believe we are describing the same thing.
It does correctly sense I am surfing with Linux, however
Are you talking about the green button for download. That's the only place I
see a version number stated, and that depends on the OS that you're using.
Bruce
On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Michael Lueck wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The front page / summary tab of the SF ooRexx project still suggests
