Hmm ... I mailed this message days ago and it just arrived at my
mailbox. So I see why that
other developer was puzzled by his non-receipt of email from the list.
Jack Woehr wrote:
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what version of the code you're trying to build from,
>>
>>
> S
Rick McGuire wrote:
> I have no idea what version of the code you're trying to build from,
>
Straight from SourceForge cvs up -PAd
Does trunk reside somewhere else now?
--
Jack J. Woehr# "Self-delusion is
http://www.well.com/~jax # half the battle!"
http://www.softwoehr.com # -
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> It looks like you are working with the old CVS repository. You need
> to use the SVN repository.
>
Whoopsie! Thanks.
--
Jack J. Woehr# "Self-delusion is
http://www.well.com/~jax # half the battle!"
http://www.softwoehr.com # - Zippy the Pinhead
-
I have no idea what version of the code you're trying to build from,
but it's not the current one. To start with, the correct value for
DATATYPE_LOGICAL is 'O', not 'G'. But that's not really relevant,
because those constants don't even reside in RexxBuiltinFunctions.h
any more. They're defined
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the current checkout from SourceForge doesn't build for me without a
> diff something like
> this:
Jack,
> Index: kernel/runtime/RexxBuiltinFunctions.h
> ===
>
Admittedly I don't know much of what's going on with the Core
Development team, but
the current checkout from SourceForge doesn't build for me without a
diff something like
this:
Index: kernel/runtime/RexxBuiltinFunctions.h
===
RCS
