Hello,
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> I passed this on to Rick on the developer list.
>
> It seems similar to some problems we first had to debug on 64-bit.
> Because values like pointer are bigger in size, it increases the size
> of objects that ooRexx is managing. This was causing new ob
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
>> Is the 64 build supposed to work on Unix ??
>
> I know of no reasons why it wouldn't. It certainly works on Linux and
> has also been successfully built on Solaris. However, it mig
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> one test is failing on AIX:
>
>
> Rainer, that looks to be some type of di
Hello,
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> one test is failing on AIX:
>>>
>> Rainer, that looks to be some type of difference in the way
>> SysIsFile() works on U
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
>> Hello,
>> one test is failing on AIX:
>
> Rainer, that looks to be some type of difference in the way
> SysIsFile() works on Unix. The assertation fails on Linux also.
No, it's a cap
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
> Hello,
> one test is failing on AIX:
Rainer, that looks to be some type of difference in the way
SysIsFile() works on Unix. The assertation fails on Linux also.
I'll fix it some time today.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Hello,
one test is failing on AIX:
3734 - all OK
3823 - one failure
Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_4.0.0(MT) 6.03 29 Dec 2008
ooRexxUnit: 2.0.0_3.2.0ooTest: 1.0.0_4.0.0
Tests ran: 18777
Assertions: 551082
Failures:1
Errors: 0
Skipped files: 21
