Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > I was looking for documentation on the "update" type of install and all > I found was a statement in the PG that said there wasn't one! Should I > open a documentation bug? > Gil, Technically, the 'update' type of install is not an update

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread Gil Barmwater
I was looking for documentation on the "update" type of install and all I found was a statement in the PG that said there wasn't one! Should I open a documentation bug? On 1/28/2014 9:55 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread David Ashley
That would fit my schedule. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 06:55 -0800, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire > wrote: > Shouldn't we do another release candidate first since we had > fixes to the last one? > > > > > Technically I suppose

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > Shouldn't we do another release candidate first since we had fixes to the > last one? > Technically I suppose we should. I was thinking that the changes were pretty low risk. Making the buffer bigger in SysFileTree was clearly needed, and

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread David Ashley
I will leave that decision up to Mark since all the fixes were for Windows. David Ashley On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 09:27 -0500, Rick McGuire wrote: > Shouldn't we do another release candidate first since we had fixes to > the last one? > > > Rick > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Mark Miesfe

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:16 AM, David Ashley wrote: > I think the major feedback from the release candidate has about stopped > so I want to propose that we release 4.2.0 this coming Monday, Feb 3. > That will give us the weekend to put the release together. > > That sounds good to me. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread Rick McGuire
Shouldn't we do another release candidate first since we had fixes to the last one? Rick On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:16 AM, David Ashley wrote: > > >> I think the major feedback from the release candidate has about stopped >> so I want to

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release

2014-01-28 Thread David Ashley
I think the major feedback from the release candidate has about stopped so I want to propose that we release 4.2.0 this coming Monday, Feb 3. That will give us the weekend to put the release together. David Ashley -- Wat

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 Release Candidate

2014-01-20 Thread David Ashley
All - I have uploaded all the *nix ooRexx 4.2.0 release candidates to SourceForge. They should all be visible in a few minutes. David Ashley -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More