On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:38 PM, David Ashley wrote:
> While I don't have strong objections to Mark's reasoning, it may need a
> little more thinking. Currently rexxutil is almost a random collection
> of functions. There is no reasoning as to what it contains.
>
> I believe that if we are going to
While I don't have strong objections to Mark's reasoning, it may need a
little more thinking. Currently rexxutil is almost a random collection
of functions. There is no reasoning as to what it contains.
I believe that if we are going to try and segregate utility functions we
should attempt to m
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
> I just tried to compile ooRexx trunk on AIX
>
> And there are other problems in
> extensions/rexxutil/platform/unix/rexxutil.cpp:
This brings up a point I wanted to make, but haven't so far from lack
of time. I don't have the time to go in
Hello,
I just tried to compile ooRexx trunk on AIX
There is one small problem in common/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp which I
just fixed (not yet committed).
And there are other problems in
extensions/rexxutil/platform/unix/rexxutil.cpp:
* AIX dos not have #include
-> I have to teach configure to h
