Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: iterators and cartesian product.

2007-10-30 Thread Bill Page
On 10/28/07, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > On 10/28/2007 10:37 PM, Bill Page wrote: > > On 10/27/07, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > >> Let me cite the documentation from stream.spad.pamphlet > >> > >> ++ A stream is an implementation of an infinite sequence using ++ a > >> list of terms that have been comp

Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: iterators and cartesian product.

2007-10-30 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: | Dear Gaby, | | I've read the Wikipedia articles about Generator and Iterator, but somehow | their difference is not completely clear to me. Seemingly a generator is more | general than an iterator. Yes, generator -- based on co-routines -- is more gene

Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: iterators and cartesian product.

2007-10-30 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Dear Gaby, I've read the Wikipedia articles about Generator and Iterator, but somehow their difference is not completely clear to me. Seemingly a generator is more general than an iterator. But now, coming to SPAD, do you think it is worthwhile to think of an implementation (for SPAD) of the I