Francois Maltey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| The display of a finite set is {...} but it's impossible to construct
| a set without the list. This may be useful to forecast a construct
| for set without built the list. imagine a list of 10^5 equal elements.
| It seems it's impossible to u
Hello Waldek,
> I have just removed support for a few constructs that I consider
> obsolete:
> - usage of '(|', '|)', '(<' and '>)' insted of '[', ']', '{' and '}'
> - APL like syntax for maps
> - "scripted symbols" in the Spad parser.
>
> Rationalle: I would like to merge old and new parser -- t
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dear Gaby, Waldek,
|
| Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > I have just removed support for a few constructs that I consider
| > obsolete:
| > - usage of '(|', '|)', '(<' and '>)' insted of '[', ']', '{' and '}'
| > - APL like syntax for map
Dear Gaby, Waldek,
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just removed support for a few constructs that I consider
> obsolete:
> - usage of '(|', '|)', '(<' and '>)' insted of '[', ']', '{' and '}'
> - APL like syntax for maps
> - "scripted symbols" in the Spad parser.
>
> Rational
This project may be of some interest to Axiom-related developers:
http://www.symbolicdata.org
About the SymbolicData Project
The SymbolicData project is set out to develop concepts and tools
for testing Computer Algebra Software (CAS) and to collect relevant
data from different areas of Comp
On 02/18/2008 07:06 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Ralf --
>
> I seem to remember that you stated many times that the use of
> domain Any is a bit annoying. Do you remember why?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Gaby
Already the name "Any" is misleading. Can I coerce
1
"blah"
Integer
SetCategory
