Re: [open-axiom-devel] Am I posing this solve problem wrong?

2008-05-07 Thread Martin Rubey
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gaby, > > could you please elaborate? I found this on the wiki: Oh, Bill answered already! Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss

Re: [open-axiom-devel] Am I posing this solve problem wrong?

2008-05-07 Thread Bill Page
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > ... > Bill Page writes: > | > | Could you please give an example of a coercion that has been moved > | to | the library? Does this include any of the coercions that are "hard > | coded" into the Axiom interpreter? > > See an example I gave

Re: [open-axiom-devel] Am I posing this solve problem wrong?

2008-05-07 Thread Martin Rubey
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Gaby, > | > | On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM, you wrote: > | > ... > | > OpenAxiom already moved many of syntactic transformations and > | > coercions to library. More remains to do done; but that woul

Re: [open-axiom-devel] Am I posing this solve problem wrong?

2008-05-07 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gaby, | | On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM, you wrote: | > ... | > OpenAxiom already moved many of syntactic transformations and | > coercions to library. More remains to do done; but that would rely | > on good, clear, abstract, object models of computat