Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| [I am not subsribed from this address, so feel free to forward it to
| the list]
Thanks!
| > mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >
| Hi Gaby,
|
| > | OpenAxiom as well as the original Axiom
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| OpenAxiom as well as the original Axiom could
| also be tested if we had an spkg - but since they don't seem to be
| easily installable in parallel
Hi Michael,
What specific issue do you have with OpenAxiom installation along
side
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe it would make sense to compare speed with the definition taken from
> URAGG. Well, no, I think it's best to fix this and move ahead. I add an
> issue on MathAction, so we can fix it.
Sorry: NO, we should compare with the speed of LENGTH$Lisp.
Ma
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> > ...
> > Yes, it's not caught under FriCAS/sbcl, too, where we also get an
> > infinite loop. The responsible part is in ILIST, where we have
> >
> > #x == LENGTH(x)$Lisp
> >...
> >
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> ...
> Yes, it's not caught under FriCAS/sbcl, too, where we also get an
> infinite loop. The responsible part is in ILIST, where we have
>
> #x == LENGTH(x)$Lisp
>...
> I have no idea how clisp checks whether a list is cyclic
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
> >
> > This looks like it is not working in OpenAxiom. It looks like I run into
> > an infinite loop.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Bill Page wrote:
> >
> >> (1) -> u:= [9,2
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
| >
| > This looks like it is not working in OpenAxiom. It looks like I run into
| > an infinite loop.
| >
| > Thanks.
| >
| > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Bill Page wrote:
| >
| >> (1) -> u:= [9,2
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
>
> This looks like it is not working in OpenAxiom. It looks like I run into
> an infinite loop.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>
>> (1) -> u:= [9,2,4,7]; concat! (u, [1,2,42]); end := rest(u,4);
>> part:=res
Please join me in thanking Alfredo for stepping forward as a new
maintainer for HyperDoc.
-- Gaby
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications wit
As of revision 782, the OpenAxiom compiler (1.3.0) will reject
syntactically equivalent duplicate definitions in domain capsules, and
syntactically equivalent signature declarations. There were a few of
those; they are now gone.
-- Gaby
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
