On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> Bill Page wrote:
>> I hope you do not mind continuation of this discussion.
>
> I should be really doing something else, but could not
> resist so I wrote quick answer.
>
Thanks. :-) i do appreciate that this discussion might seem too
"philos
Bill Page wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> >
> > Bill Page wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Although it is currently a stand alone domain, 'Void' could be easily
> >> made to satisfy 'SetCategory' by providing a simple '=' operation.
> >> Since by definition 'Void' has only a
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> Bill Page wrote:
>> ...
>> Although it is currently a stand alone domain, 'Void' could be easily
>> made to satisfy 'SetCategory' by providing a simple '=' operation.
>> Since by definition 'Void' has only a single "canonical" value we can
>
