On 12/01/2010 06:28 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Arthur Ralfs writes:
>
> | On 12/01/2010 09:35 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> |>
> |> Hi,
> |>
> |> The entire OpenAxiom build system now uses C++ compilers to compile
> |> C or C++ codes. This will make it possible to use functionalities (such
Arthur Ralfs writes:
| On 12/01/2010 09:35 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Hi,
| >
| > The entire OpenAxiom build system now uses C++ compilers to compile
| > C or C++ codes. This will make it possible to use functionalities (such
| > as regex) that are standard only in C++ libraries.
|
| T
On 12/01/2010 09:35 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The entire OpenAxiom build system now uses C++ compilers to compile
> C or C++ codes. This will make it possible to use functionalities (such
> as regex) that are standard only in C++ libraries.
That's excellent. Do you still have to ma
Yue Li writes:
| I will also appreciate if the termination signal problem in SBCL
| based OpenAxiom can be fixed ;-)
That is essentially an SBCL problem. If you can convince SBCL people to
provide a standard idiom for SBCL to honor ^C, that will solve the issue.
--
Hi,
The entire OpenAxiom build system now uses C++ compilers to compile
C or C++ codes. This will make it possible to use functionalities (such
as regex) that are standard only in C++ libraries.
Several bugs with the `open-axiom' (driver in script mode) have been
fixed. Also added the capabili
