2009/10/8 Jason Etheridge :
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Forrest, Stuart wrote:
>> We have a weird problem here that happens only on certain PC’s.
>
> Stuart, to eliminate the possibility of some saved setting
> interfering, try creating a new "profile" for the problem staff client
> as desc
Jason and Don,
I just recreated it here. I was able to correctly re-execute the search after
closing and reopening the z39.50 interface. I did not have to close the entire
client. I will test with other title/author and ISBN combinations to see if it
holds true for others.
Elaine
J. El
2009/10/12 Hardy, Elaine :
> Jason and Don,
>
> I just recreated it here. I was able to correctly re-execute the search
> after closing and reopening the z39.50 interface. I did not have to close
> the entire client. I will test with other title/author and ISBN combinations
> to see if it holds t
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
> 2009/10/12 Hardy, Elaine :
>> Jason and Don,
>>
>> I just recreated it here. I was able to correctly re-execute the search
>> after closing and reopening the z39.50 interface. I did not have to close
>> the entire client. I will test with othe
Just to note: We at Beaufort are having this problem mainly with OCLC.
I deleted the users profile, created a new one then tried the search process
again. It eorked OK for about 5 or 6 tries then went back to what it was doing
before.
IE in this order: Search Auth/Title records returned
2009/10/12 Mike Rylander :
>> S, we'll want to add the accepted truncation value to the 950 seed
>> data for LoC. This is probably required for 1.6 if the corresponding
>> changes from trunk were backported, yes? In which case, I guess we
>> won't need to create upgrade scripts as the base dat
I've not been able to reliable recreate it in OCLC searching again. I tried
about six other author/title/ISBN combinations as well as the example you sent
again and it never occurred another time.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects & Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Libr
I'm trying to create a report that will give me the number of users by
patron type *for a specific date*. That last one is stumping me. I can't
figure out how to get a timestamp for say, Sept. 30. My source is ILS
User.
Any assistance would be appreciated. (We're on Evergreen 1.4.0.6)
Thanks,
Ca
Hi Catherine,
Would it be patrons who used the library (checked out, placed a hold, etc) on a
specific date? Or patrons who were created on a specific date? What is the
importance of the date in your report? Dates in Evergreen are almost always
tied to actions.
Chris
Chris Sharp
PINES Prog
I did it. I need to know the total number of registered patrons on the last day
of the month. I ended up filtering this: ILS User ---> User Demographics --->
Record Creation Date/Time, with a field transform of Year+Month and an Operator
of On or Before (Date/Time).
When I compared the data be
10 matches
Mail list logo