Correct. It was Greg and I'm afraid I don't know Greg's last name or
email off hand but troy.beck...@yclibrary.net is their sysadmin and can
put you in touch with him. Ned Little, nlit...@florencelibrary.org has
also worked with Chrome Moly and PWB a fair bit.
--
Rogan Hamby
Information Techn
Hi Repke:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Repke de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> though we worked out our combination of calling marc2bre followed by
> pg_loader followed by psql as successive, separate steps - we are dead in
> the water 'cause PosgreSQL alone (last step) takes four hours for 100K
>
Hi
It was someone from York, SC (SCLENDS) I'll try and get the name for you but
they are using chrome moly from the people who do PWB.
Stuart
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] o
Hi there,
Sorry for the vagueness, but at the conference, someone gave a
lightning talk about OPAC kiosks and I didn't catch your name or the
name of the software you used for kiosks. I'm wondering if you could
maybe share some details on the list?
At Sitka we have a number of libraries who have
Hi Anoop,
The site looks great! Many thanks to you and the rest of the website
improvement team who helped out on
the overhaul!
-jc
> ---Original Message---
> From: Atre, Anoop S
> To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
>
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Website Updated
>
Joe,
Done, provided some contrast between stable/unstable and changed the text right
above the downloads table to specify that the stable release is suggested for
production systems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Anoop Atre
IS Developer & Integrator, MnPALS
PH: 507.389.5060
Hi,
though we worked out our combination of calling marc2bre followed by pg_loader
followed by psql as successive, separate steps - we are dead in the water
'cause PosgreSQL alone (last step) takes four hours for 100K records: meaning
40 hours for all of our one million bib records.
Also does
Thank you, Jason.
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 14:50 -0400, Jason Stephenson wrote:
> Quoting Vicki Reeves :
>
>
> > I've been told that we can set some attribute of the bib record so that
> > it will always show in the OPAC but I can't find anywhere to set it so
> > that might be in version 2.x
>
> Y
Hey Anoop,
The site looks great, especially the downloads page. In the downloads page I
would probably add "recommended" after the word stable for the 2.0 series,
and change the status row header to look like the rest to provide more
contrast between the unstable and stable. The news feed looks gr
Quoting Vicki Reeves :
I've been told that we can set some attribute of the bib record so that
it will always show in the OPAC but I can't find anywhere to set it so
that might be in version 2.x
You can only set that in the database with a SQL query. You want to
set the transcendant [sic] f
Hope everyone had a great conference!
Just wanted to make a note that the website has been updated and you will find
things a bit different from yesterday, hopefully for the better. I noticed that
I had to clear my cache to get the menu working so some of you might see the
same glitch. Other th
We are a new single planting currently running 1.6.0.8. We want to add
MARC records for our electronic resource records which are mostly
Overdrive and Gutenberg (we are a mirror site).
The records I have will upload from the Import MARC feature but will
only show in the OPAC if I add subfield 9
Hi All,
I posted to the listserv at the end of last week and thought that I would
repost now that everyone is back and fresh from the conference.
I am trying to figure out the macros to display the patron email address and
phone number on a bills_historical template. I can't seem to figure it o
Thank you Jason!
Kathy
> -Original Message-
> From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org]
> On Behalf Of Jason Etheridge
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:50 AM
> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
> Subject: Re:
> Can anyone tell me what the difference is between the print full pull list
> and print full pull list (alternate strategy) options in the Pull List for
> Hold Requests? I'm looking at a 2.0.3 system.
Both of these are attempts at handling very large pull lists that can
perform poorly in the nati
15 matches
Mail list logo