[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Rescheduled DIG Meeting

2011-08-03 Thread Karen Collier
Let's plan to meet Monday, August 22 at 2:30 PM EST. It will be an August/September meeting. Thanks for your feedback. Karen - "Karen Collier" wrote: > My apologies, but something unavoidable came up at the last minute and > I will be unable to attend today's DIG meeting. I initially in

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Joseph Lewis
You're probably right, judging by the alexa ranking: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/qsos.org Although next month they could be huge :) Joseph -- Public Key: [0xF8462E1593141C16] In a time of drastic change it is the learners

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
I was interested in QSOS less for the features summary piece (which I agree is very inadaquate) than for the evaluation of the community or project. But if no one has ever heard about them, maybe not worth worrying about! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lori Bowen Ayre // L

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On 08/03/2011 12:35 PM, Galen Charlton wrote: That quibble aside, I could see an evaluation framework like QSOS being useful (sort of like an OpenRFP that has, well, more openness), but it doesn't strike me as being a shortcut for creating feature comparison lists, especially since one part

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On 08/03/2011 11:55 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote: Has anyone ever heard of this group? See http://www.qsos.org/?p=137 FWIW, I hadn't heard of them until now, and some superficial Googling doesn't show any sign that that they've attracted much buzz or influence in procurement or decision pr

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Joseph Lewis
It doesn't look that bad: http://qsos.org/wiki/index.php/Create_a_new_QSOS_evaluation It seems that you just need to install a Firefox extension and do some typing. - Joseph -- Public Key: [0xF8462E1593141C16] In a time of d

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
Sorry, my bad. Yes, it's evaluated. Any clue about how one gets to be evaluated so we could have 2.0 listed? Lori =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lori Bowen Ayre // Library Technology Consultant / The Galecia Group Oversight Board & Communications Committee / Evergreen (70

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Jason Stephenson
Quoting Lori Bowen Ayre : Hi All, I just found a site that evaluates open source projects based on an established set of criteria and I note that they list Evergreen but it isn't evaluated. And even the version listed is 1.2.4. It would be nice to have them run their program against a more cu

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] QSOS.org

2011-08-03 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
Hi All, I just found a site that evaluates open source projects based on an established set of criteria and I note that they list Evergreen but it isn't evaluated. And even the version listed is 1.2.4. It would be nice to have them run their program against a more current version of Evergreen.