Hi Scott,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Scott Thomas wrote:
> I feel like I am asking a lot of questions, but we are kind of new to this…
>
>
> ** **
>
> RDA tags 264, 336, 337, and 338 appear in our MARC displays, but not in
> our OPAC displays. My assumption is that this is a configura
I feel like I am asking a lot of questions, but we are kind of new to this...
RDA tags 264, 336, 337, and 338 appear in our MARC displays, but not in our
OPAC displays. My assumption is that this is a configuration issue and not
related to the fact that we are still at 2.1. Am I correct in this
Calvin College in Michigan has been selected as the host of the Hack-A-Way
this year. Dan Wells, well known in the developer community, is organizing
the hosting effort.
Some details:
- Dates: We are currently working on dates in the second half of September.
Once Dan has those dates developers
ja...@esilibrary.com
> | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Rogan Hamby, MLS, CCNP, MIA
>
> Managers Headquarters Library and Reference Services,
>
> York County Library System
>
>
>
> "You can never get a cup
The problem can be the policy, a policy that reflects certain
characteristics of the ILS. When the ILS changes, the policy doesn't and can
complicate things needlessly.
George
Computer Services Librarian
-Original Message-
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:o
As a followup, I'd ask what problem are you trying to solve that isn't
solved by the expiration date of a patron record?
That might give more insight to an appropriate solution.
--
Jason Stephenson
Assistant Director for Technology Services
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
It leads to the questions: what is your library's policy and what is the
reason for marking patrons inactive? I would tend to think the main reason
would be for accurate statistics -- so your patron count wouldn't be
inflated with accounts that have expired years ago.
Thanks.
George Tuttle
I think Jason's is a bit more elegant but if you have a specific need for
that kind of criteria that can be done a slightly more involved SQL
statement to run periodically too (daily).
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jason Etheridge wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have a set of criteria like
> Would it be possible to have a set of criteria like:
If not not using expire dates set far in the future, it may be simpler
to just base it off of expire date. If the account has been expired
for over X amount of time, then flag the account inactive. What do
you think? We could do that with
Some ILSs have the ability to periodically convert large numbers of patron
records to inactive. What about Evergreen?
Would it be possible to have a set of criteria like:
If a patron has no items currently out,
If there are no bills on the patron’s account,
And if there has been no activity
Hi all,
Just a reminder that the web team will be meeting today at 2 PM EDT, 11
AM PDT, 18:00 UTC in the #Evergreen IRC channel -
http://evergreen-ils.org/irc.php.
The agenda is available at
http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=webteam:meetings:agenda:2013-05-09
For those who are
11 matches
Mail list logo
