Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: Evergreen Acquistions vs some other method

2015-11-06 Thread Donald Butterworth
At Asbury Seminary we have been using the Acq module since we went live a year and a half ago. For the most part, it handles Firm Orders correctly. It is not designed to handle Standing Orders, e.g. Periodicals, Serials, Monographic series, and Blanket orders. To handle these types of orders we

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-06 Thread Josh Stompro
Elaine, Thanks for all the feedback. It has helped me work though the options. We do have a test system that we can try things out on, once I get it updated with a more recent copy of our production system. Here is a summary of what I think our options are. 1. Manually route

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-06 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Josh, If you are a consortium with a floating collection, and no property designation on the item, does it matter which copy fills which hold as long as the hold gets filled? Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Job Announcement: Technology Specialist/System Administration (Columbus, OH)

2015-11-06 Thread Matt Polcyn
**Please excuse cross-posting** Technology Specialist/System Administration OhioNET Columbus, OH OhioNET, a not-for-profit library service organization, is looking for a qualified individual with a background in library systems administration to fill its open Technology Specialist

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: Evergreen Acquistions vs some other method

2015-11-06 Thread Morgan, Christine
Hi Sharon, We are a consortium of 28 libraries. We have 12 libraries currently using EG Acquisitions and 2 libraries using MARC Batch Import to load on order bibs and items into the catalog. The workflows for our acquisitions libraries vary greatly depending on staffing and need. Many of our

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-06 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Josh, A floating collection would certainly change how you would handle items. No PINES library has a floating collections at this point, so I am not sure I can answer your questions since we don't have experience with it. I can tell you that, with PINES holds configuration, there is no

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-06 Thread Morgan, Michele
Hi Josh, One thing you could try is to add the new items with a non-holdable status. Then you can check them in and they will be set in transit to their circ library rather than being captured for any holds. I'm not sure exactly what will happen when they're received at their circ library. It