+1 to holdings.
I like that because it's consistent with "Holdings transfer" and can be
either a copy or a volume. Holdings should be familiar to any librarian who
used MARC record loads to create items 852 or 94x fields.
Janet Schrader
Bibliographic Services Supervisor | CW MARS
67 Millbrook
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Elaine Hardy
wrote:
> I do like Holdings transfer. I think it is a good descriptor of what we
> are doing with the functionality.
>
> A little quibble, though with not having the button labelled Add volumes
> and copies. I realize that is cumbersome, however, it i
