[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Awesome Box Integration

2014-09-26 Thread Vanya Jauhal
Hello Everyone As Kathy mentioned, making the recommendation system configurable would make the system more flexible and the administrators can decide their settings depending upon their respective needs. As far as the privacy issues are concerned, we can initially build the model on people who

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Awesome Box Integration

2014-09-26 Thread Ruth Frasur
I don't have anything of value to add to this other than while, of course, I love the idea of reader recommendations and Awesome Box integration in any form, I also think there would HAVE to be some type of anonymizing (sp?) of patron data. I don't think this is impossible BUT, as Rogan has said,

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Awesome Box Integration

2014-09-26 Thread Rogan Hamby
FWIW, there isn't any reason for patron data to be exposed and privacy issue on a display level here. The privacy discussion is really a distraction from the Awesome Box discussion in my opinion. Some libraries may anonymize (or wipe) older data while others don't but that data existing and

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Awesome Box Integration

2014-09-26 Thread McCanna, Terran
@list.georgialibraries.org Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 10:55:27 AM Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] ***SPAM*** Re: Awesome Box Integration FWIW, there isn't any reason for patron data to be exposed and privacy issue on a display level here. The privacy discussion is really a distraction from the Awesome Box