I've created such a space at
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=search:activity_metric_configs.
I started with the badges that are currently being used at CW MARS. I
know of a few other sites that are using them. I hope you all add your
details there too!
Kathy
On 04/10/2018 11:57
I don't think this is in heavy use yet but I'm a big proponent of us
creating a space on the community wiki for people to share their formulas
and how they work.
Rogan Hamby, MLIS
Data and Project Analyst
Equinox Open Library Initiative
phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
email:
We have not yet implemented this either and would also love to see examples
/ get feedback.
Thank you!
Terran McCanna
PINES Program Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345
404-235-7138
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:52 PM,
We're currently testing the activity metric feature (AKA Statistical
Popularity Badges) and are planning to implement this on our public catalog
soon. If you currently have this turned on or are testing it, we'd love to
know which badge configurations you're using, and how they're working. If
All,
I don't have much time to go into detail right now (meetings solid
this afternoon), but in order to get the basics out there so Thomas
and others can start looking at it I'm going paste some SQL below, and
then give some basic narrative on how it could be generalized for use
in a
I'm very fond of the idea myself and shared it with a group of SCLENDS
libraries a few weeks ago and a lot of ears perked up.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Kathy Lussier kluss...@masslnc.org wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to everyone for their feedback to this project! Mike, we hadn't
considered
Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Activity metric for relevance
Kathy,
Have you considered allowing an aging parameter for some bumps, so that
newer data toward the near end of the horizon is considered more
important? For instance, spikes in circulation might have a larger
The current plan would not take into account how recent the circs (or
holds) were, just that they were within a configurable time period of
the time the cronjob that counts them last ran (default will likely be
to include those from within the last 6 to 12 months). If you have an
algorithm
Something that took into consideration how current the circs/holds were
could be valuable I think in reflecting a more ... natural effect that
titles have in relevancy.
For example, Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn. In the first 24 hours that the
bib was in our system the total holds might be
*From:* open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:
open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike
Rylander
*Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:11 PM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Activity metric for relevance
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Thomas Berezansky tsb...@mvlc.org wrote:
The current plan would not take into account how recent the circs (or
holds) were, just that they were within a configurable time period of the
time the cronjob that counts them last ran (default will likely be to
Hi all,
MassLNC is working with our partners at MVLC to develop an activity
metric (aka popularity metric) that will allow sites to rank more
popular items a little higher in search results than items that don't
see as much activity. I've raised this idea on the list before. Although
Am I correct in assuming that the bump amount is essentially the weight
that bump will have when adding up the total effect of the bumps on that
search?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Kathy Lussier kluss...@masslnc.org wrote:
Hi all,
MassLNC is working with our partners at MVLC to develop
Hi Rogan,
Yes, that's right. According to Thomas Berezansky, if you have other
relevancy bumps active from search.relevance_adjustment, they will be
combined, so it won't just be the activity metrics.
Kathy
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508)
Kathy,
Have you considered allowing an aging parameter for some bumps, so that
newer data toward the near end of the horizon is considered more important?
For instance, spikes in circulation might have a larger short term effect
on relevance, but over time, while still being factored into
15 matches
Mail list logo