Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation And Holds "Rewrite"

2012-03-12 Thread Thomas Berezansky
Going down your replies... For relative OU matching: I was planning on allow both absolute and relative matching in the same matchpoint, but not on the same *field*. That is, each "ou" field in the matchpoint would be allowed to be null, a specific OU, or a relative OU. Thus, you could sa

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation And Holds "Rewrite"

2012-03-12 Thread Mike Rylander
This shouldn't be construed as implicit endorsement of the whole plan, but I have some initial thoughts below. Overall, it's heading in a good direction, IMO. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Thomas Berezansky wrote: > I would like to make a number of changes to circulation and holds, but have >

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation And Holds "Rewrite"

2012-03-12 Thread Thomas Berezansky
I would like to make a number of changes to circulation and holds, but have determined that they will interact with each other significantly code-wise. Thus I am planning to do them as one large project, rather than as smaller chunks that would be difficult to keep working with each other i