Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Improving LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors

>> Issue #5 No entries found when doing "Bib Call Number" searches Speaking of bib call numbers, I wish they weren't included in the keyword index. These can add clutter to search results -- LC subdivisions like SF and TX get in with Science Fiction and Texas searches, and strings of numbers

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Improving LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors

Hi Don, Some answers inline below. Hi Kathy Issue #2 Multiple Suffixes in Volume and Copy Creator Are you talking about the suffix field here or the parts field? I was thinking the parts field would be the most appropriate place to store the volume/part information. Is there a rea

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Improving LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors

Hi Kathy Issue #2 Multiple Suffixes in Volume and Copy Creator Are you talking about the suffix field here or the parts field? I was thinking the parts field would be the most appropriate place to store the volume/part information. Is there a reason you can't have a part listed as "volume 1, part 1

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Improving LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors

Thank you for pulling this list together Don! I have a couple of questions/comments. Issue #2 Multiple Suffixes in Volume and Copy Creator The suffix structure is not sufficiently complex to handle LC call numbers that include multiple suffixes such as volume 1, part 1, volume 1, pa

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Improving LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors

Colleagues, Another priority that emerged from the Evergreen for Academics survey is Library of Congress Call Numbers displays and behaviors. My assignment is to identify issues. To that end an Evergreen DokuWiki was created entitled Improve LC Call Number Displays & Behaviors