Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Testing and Evergreen's quality (was: Database schema deprecation/supersedes stuff)

2011-07-05 Thread Dan Scott
Hi Mike: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Mike Rylander wrote: > Top-posting because my response (or, more appropriately, follow-up) is > in the form of a public google doc. > > Short version: We agree on all the goals, so I propose a way forward > that leverages the size (bigger than pre-2.0 and

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Testing and Evergreen's quality (was: Database schema deprecation/supersedes stuff)

2011-06-22 Thread Mike Rylander
Top-posting because my response (or, more appropriately, follow-up) is in the form of a public google doc. Short version: We agree on all the goals, so I propose a way forward that leverages the size (bigger than pre-2.0 and growing) of our community and IMO gives us the tools to enact change towa

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Testing and Evergreen's quality (was: Database schema deprecation/supersedes stuff)

2011-06-05 Thread Dan Scott
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Mike Rylander wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Dan Scott wrote: >>  * Are we ready to start making use of pgTAP? Changing the database >> schema seems like a perfect use case for unit tests, to ensure that >> expected behaviour is maintained through the u