I can't start iscsid (2.0-869) on a 2.6.25.1 vanilla kernel, running as
a Xen guest.
# iscsid -c /etc/iscsi/iscsid.conf
# echo $?
1
There is no iscsid process running.
Interesting is, it starts just fine in the foreground:
# iscsid -c /etc/iscsi/iscsid.conf -f -d 2
iscsid: transport class ver
aspasia schrieb:
>
> On Apr 29, 1:10 pm, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> aspasia schrieb:
>>
>> If you're referring
>> tohttp://wpkg.org/Diskless_/_remote_boot_with_Open-iSCSI, rootfs is
>> currently hardcoded.
>>
>
> thanks ... yeah .. i remember your paper ... i am almost get
> shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 52, IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL|0644) = -1 ENOSYS (Function
> not implemented)
What OS under Xen are you running that doesn't have the shm* commands
implemented?
That is your problem BTW.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
Konrad Rzeszutek schrieb:
>> shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 52, IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL|0644) = -1 ENOSYS (Function
>> not implemented)
>
> What OS under Xen are you running that doesn't have the shm* commands
> implemented?
> That is your problem BTW.
Yeah, it looks to me I'm missing some kernel option - I s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:20 -0500:
> Erez Zilber wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> Erez Zilber wrote:
>>>
This new thread summarizes and continues a discussion that we (Mike, Or
and myself) had outside the list. This is what we have so far:
* Havin
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:33:42PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
> Konrad Rzeszutek schrieb:
> >> shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 52, IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL|0644) = -1 ENOSYS (Function
> >> not implemented)
> >
> > What OS under Xen are you running that doesn't have the shm* commands
> > implemented?
> >
Konrad Rzeszutek schrieb:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:33:42PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> Konrad Rzeszutek schrieb:
shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 52, IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL|0644) = -1 ENOSYS (Function
not implemented)
>>> What OS under Xen are you running that doesn't have the shm* commands
On May 2, 7:14 am, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aspasia schrieb:
>
>
> iSCSI initiators and dynamic IP address are two things which don't like
> each other very much.
>
> It will work if you add a dhclient to your initrd, but with any IP
> address change you'll run into proble
> What target are you using?
Hi Mike,
AFAIR it's a Cisco MDS 9200 series, which then redirects to the
"proper" targets. I'm not sure what these are running on.
regards,
Lukasz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
> The bug in this thread is is just a dumb problem where discovery.c gets
> LOGIN_REDIRECT and treats it like success instead of following the new
> portal.
Great. So it's a bug then.
Does a patch exist, or is this the patch you have mentioned? :)
regards,
Lukasz
--~--~-~--~~--
aspasia schrieb:
>
>
> On May 2, 7:14 am, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> aspasia schrieb:
>>
>>
>> iSCSI initiators and dynamic IP address are two things which don't like
>> each other very much.
>>
>> It will work if you add a dhclient to your initrd, but with any IP
>> addres
11 matches
Mail list logo