On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 2:26 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
wrote:
> Please consider the v4 below with the lock added.
>
Reviewed-by: Khazhismel Kumykov
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Khazhismel Kumykov writes:
>> >> + if (!list_empty(>conn_list_err))
>> > Does this check need to be under connlock?
>>
>> My understanding is that it is not necessary, since it is serialized
>> against the conn removal itself, through the rx_mutex, it seemed safe to
>> do the verification
