On 01/05/2011 04:58 PM, Eddie Wai wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 12:50 -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
On 01/05/2011 02:44 PM, Eddie Wai wrote:
For scenarios where the shost is not being passed to bnx2i for the
iSCSI offload connection request, the code would consult the routing
table to select the
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 12:50 -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 02:44 PM, Eddie Wai wrote:
> > For scenarios where the shost is not being passed to bnx2i for the
> > iSCSI offload connection request, the code would consult the routing
> > table to select the CNIC device.
> > This code path
On 01/05/2011 02:44 PM, Eddie Wai wrote:
For scenarios where the shost is not being passed to bnx2i for the
iSCSI offload connection request, the code would consult the routing
table to select the CNIC device.
This code path will erroneously error out if the corresponding L2
interface's MTU has b
For scenarios where the shost is not being passed to bnx2i for the
iSCSI offload connection request, the code would consult the routing
table to select the CNIC device.
This code path will erroneously error out if the corresponding L2
interface's MTU has been setup to > 1500.
Signed-off-by: Eddie
