Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix scsi device's iodone_cnt mismatch with iorequest_cnt

2022-11-30 Thread Martin K. Petersen
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 20:21:35 +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote: > Following scenario would make scsi_device's iodone_cnt mismatch with > iorequest_cnt even if there is no request on this device any more. > > 1. request timeout happened. If we do not retry the timeouted command, >this command would be

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix scsi device's iodone_cnt mismatch with iorequest_cnt

2022-11-23 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Wenchao, > Following scenario would make scsi_device's iodone_cnt mismatch with > iorequest_cnt even if there is no request on this device any more. Applied to 6.2/scsi-staging, thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- You received this message because you are subscrib

[PATCH v3 0/2] Fix scsi device's iodone_cnt mismatch with iorequest_cnt

2022-11-23 Thread 'Wenchao Hao' via open-iscsi
Following scenario would make scsi_device's iodone_cnt mismatch with iorequest_cnt even if there is no request on this device any more. 1. request timeout happened. If we do not retry the timeouted command, this command would be finished in scsi_finish_command() which would not increase t