[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 01 May 2008 16:50 +0300:
> InitialR2T=Yes means that R2T is required, hence no unsolicited data.
> Only is both sides, initiator and target agree on InitialR2T=No then
> first data burst is unsolicited.
Thanks for the explanation. I keep getting that backwards.
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:13 +0300:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Agree with the interpretation of the spec, and it's probably a bit
> > >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:13 +0300:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Agree with the interpretation of the spec, and it's probably a bit
> > > clearer that way too. But we have working initiators and targets
> > > that do i
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agree with the interpretation of the spec, and it's probably a bit
> > clearer that way too. But we have working initiators and targets
> > that do it the "wrong" way.
>
> Yes... I guess the key question is whethe
