With 5 votes in favor, and none opposed, the vote passes. I've
updated the dependencies in the appropriate pom.xml files and committed.
Thanks to all who voted!
On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
+1 (belated).
On 2/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Craig
Craig-
It would be really good to include the JIRA number in the commit
message text. That way, JIRA automatically will track the svn
checkin with the JIRA issue.
Yeah, you're right ... I fixed it after reading the first e-mail
about the problem, but before I noticed that a JIRA had alrea
+1 (belated).
On 2/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Craig
On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> database & JDBC driver
Hi Marc,
Good to see this taken care of so quickly.
It would be really good to include the JIRA number in the commit
message text. That way, JIRA automatically will track the svn checkin
with the JIRA issue.
Thanks,
Craig
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mpr
+1
My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything
done through official channels.
Craig
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marc Prud'hommeaux resolved OPENJPA-140.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Marc Prud'hommeaux
Fixed incorrect directory loc
Oops! How odd that maven didn't given an error in the compile or
build stages.
Anyway, I've moved all the files to a company/ subdirectory. Please
let me know if you still have problems after updating.
Sorry about that.
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thi
Wrong package name in test classes
--
Key: OPENJPA-140
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-140
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael Dick
It looks like the package for
Hi Mike,
This is clearly wrong. Can you file a JIRA?
Craig
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Michael Dick wrote:
Hi Marc,
The classes in
incubator/openjpa/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/
apache/openjpa/persistence/models
declare package org.apache.openjpa.persistence.models.comp
FYI. The official JPA jars that pass the TCK will be put into the
maven repo shortly.
Craig
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Lance J. Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 9, 2007 10:26:21 AM PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please review: changes to push new versions to maven
+1
The Geronimo API is verified using the official Jee5 signatures file.
-dain
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471761
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-138:
--
I was waiting for Abe to weigh in... :-)
> o Cache the Type hashcodes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471744
]
Abe White commented on OPENJPA-138:
---
o Cache the TransactionManager in JNDIManagedRuntime
+1
o Cache the Class i
+1
Either move to the Geronimo version or get the dev.java version updated.
Either way, just so that we're using a spec-compliant version of the API.
Thanks!
Kevin
On 2/8/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from
+1
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the
final version of the spec: there are some
15 matches
Mail list logo
