Does this bugreport cover persistent units defined in different persistence.xml
files too? If I am not mistaken, OpenJPA looks at first persistent unit of
randomly chosen persistence.xml file.
- Original Message
From: Kevin Sutter (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.ap
How do you "generate" Eclipse projects? "mvn eclipse:eclipse" from
OpenJPA source root almost ;-) works for me. I manually fix
openjpa-kernel/target/generated-sources source path after importing
projects, but everything else seems to be handled properly.
Rahul Thakur wrote:
Hi,
I am just sta
You can use use RAW(16) to store GUIDs in Oracle. This datatype is
allowed in primary keys.
--
Regards,
Igor
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Can you have java field of type byte[] that maps to a NUMERIC (or heck a
varchar) in he db? I'm guessing that Kevin's guid is a fixed 128 bit
number. If it is a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-91?page=comments#action_12460593 ]
Igor Fedorenko commented on OPENJPA-91:
---
Also, how do you configure database connection? Do you use WAS datasource or
tell OpenJPA driver/connection details
Is it possible to use SynchronizeMappings without persistent class list?
In my case it is kinda difficult to create (and maintain) persistent
class list and it would be really nice not to have to run mapping tool
after every change, even if that would mean somewhat slower startup.
--
Regards,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=all ]
Igor Fedorenko updated OPENJPA-63:
--
Attachment: db2-selectForUpdate2.patch.diff
Revised patch that uses "WITH RR USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS" for-update clause
and tolerates JDBC
, Subclipse 1.1.8
Reporter: Igor Fedorenko
Priority: Trivial
It would be nice if Eclipse project metadata files were added to svn ignore in
OpenJPA subversion repository. These files can be generated by maven (by
running "mvn eclipse:eclipse"), but then show up as local
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12448377 ]
Igor Fedorenko commented on OPENJPA-63:
---
I guess I have not explained the problem I was trying to solve, so let me do
that before I answer your specific
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=all ]
Igor Fedorenko updated OPENJPA-63:
--
Attachment: db2-selectForUpdate.patch
I ran the few unit tests that come with OpenJPA against DB2 and they worked.
> Better pissimistic lock support
Environment: IBM DB2 UDB v8.2 or later
Reporter: Igor Fedorenko
There is new SELECT "FOR READ ONLY WITH RS USE AND KEEP EXCLUSIVE LOCKS" syntax
in DB2 v8.2 and later that can be used to implement pessimistic locks for
selects with multiple from tables, subselects, inner/outer
10 matches
Mail list logo