Java 2 Security enablement
--
Key: OPENJPA-244
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-244
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.9.8
Reporter: Kevin Sutter
Via some testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reopened OPENJPA-184:
--
Assignee: David Wisneski
Sorry, I'm going to re-open this Issue. I don't see any mention of
Need to support floating point primary keys
---
Key: OPENJPA-214
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-214
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jdbc
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484873
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-186:
--
Jacek,
I just reproduced your problem. It looks to be related to the s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484280
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-172:
--
It sounds like WebSphere is working as expected. Since you are attempt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484274
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-172:
--
>From Ritikia (via dev mailing list)...
Kevin,
Yes it is JPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484226
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-172:
--
Ritika,
The message you referenced...
<0|true|0.9.6-incubating> org.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482462
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-132:
--
Abe,
Can you post your patch so that we can see how the two approaches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-165:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.9.7
I've discussed this problem with Jonathan and we should have a patch availa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-165:
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> QueryImpl.setFirstResult does not take already set maxResults int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-5:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0
Affects Version/s: 0.9.0
0.9.6
> OpenJPA doesn't c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-149:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.9.7
Priority: Blocker
Affects Version/s: 0.9.6
I am assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-149:
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> non-jta-data-source must be specified in WebSphere environments
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478779
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-113:
--
FYI, we have also encountered this problem with annotations. If you re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476744
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-160:
--
> IIRC, we're operating in a commit-then-review mode in OpenJPA. This i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476737
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-149:
--
Brad,
For now, go ahead and use the workaround as documented by Patrick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-139.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Code changed per Issue comments via SVN revision 505099.
> PersistenceExcep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-141.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Code changes complete per comments in Issue.
> More performance improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-138.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Code changes per Issue comments are complete.
> More performance improvemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476054
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-134:
--
The following conversation has also been recorded in the dev mailing li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474324
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-149:
--
The referenced method
(com.ibm.ws.Transaction.TransactionManagerFactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474323
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-153:
--
This is a temporary situation. WebSphere has always had the convention
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473521
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
> Looks good to me. Super-tiny nit: you've got a brace on a newline in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-141:
-
Attachment: openjpa-141.txt
Just posted another version of the performance patch for openjpa-141
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473445
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Getting close to another patch posting...
>> The two-way check in Fetc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473243
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Yes, good catch, Craig. The original location that I wanted to resolve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473228
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Good thing I posted the patch... ;-)
>1. Why not keep a single assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-141:
-
Attachment: openjpa-141.txt
On second thought, I have attached the proposed patch to this Issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472840
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Personally, I think I provide sufficient due diligence on the Issues th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472790
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Sounds good, Abe. Thanks for the comments, Abe and Craig. Here's the
Problems with Single Table Inheritance Strategy (and Discriminator Type of
Integer)
---
Key: OPENJPA-143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-143
Project: O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472674
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
> No, the current code holds the Classes with hard refs, and maps them
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472516
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
> So what might work is having the keys be weak, and the otherwise unre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472440
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-141:
--
Re: Caching the TransactionManager in a static...
Although we could c
More performance improvements (in response to changes for OPENJPA-138)
--
Key: OPENJPA-141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-141
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472171
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-138:
--
Thanks for the input from everybody on this topic. I've decided on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471761
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-138:
--
I was waiting for Abe to weigh in... :-)
> o Cache the Type hashcodes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471580
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-138:
--
Thanks for the insights, Patrick. Here are some new observations and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-139:
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> PersistenceException merging an entity with a Calendar field.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471536
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-139:
--
Mike will work with me to get this patch committed.
> PersistenceExcep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471535
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-138:
--
To give everyone a heads up on the type of changes I plan to introduce
More performance improvements for OpenJPA (lib and kernel)
--
Key: OPENJPA-138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-138
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Sub-task
Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-133.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Modified the processing of the getMethod() method to find the designated
me
Perform parameter validation for annotated callback methods
---
Key: OPENJPA-137
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-137
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Sub-task
C
Can't find non-public callback methods with superclass or interface parameters
--
Key: OPENJPA-133
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-133
Project: OpenJPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-98.
-
Resolution: Fixed
This problem will be resolved in SR5 of the IBM v5 JDK. The availability of an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-119.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved.
> EntityManager.clear() should not implicitly invoke the flush op
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469868
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-119:
--
Here's what I decided to do... I introduced a new boolean on the
deta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-115.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Changes committed to SVN.
> Bottleneck(s) with using OpenJPA in a Container
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469598
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-115:
--
I'm going to go ahead with the proposed changes to remove the explicit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469565
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-119:
--
Sure, I can do the boolean parameter. I just thought a compile failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469556
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-119:
--
Contrary to Abe's comments in the dev mailing list, this problem may ea
EntityManager.clear() should not implicitly invoke the flush operation
--
Key: OPENJPA-119
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-116.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This issue was temporarily resolved with the patch that Mike provided. Abe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-116:
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> EntityManager.getDelegate should throw an IllegalStateException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468616
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-115:
--
Thanks, Patrick and Craig. I did some looking in lib and found that we
Bottleneck(s) with using OpenJPA in a Container-managed environment
---
Key: OPENJPA-115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-115
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Exploit features of JDBC 4
--
Key: OPENJPA-114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-114
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: jdbc
Reporter: Kevin Sutter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467626
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-5:
Oops... We have so many of these JDBC 4 type Issues that I screwed up with m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467529
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-5:
To follow on to one of Marc's earlier comments... These updates to support t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-107.
--
Resolution: Fixed
George has verified that the problem goes away with SR3 of the IBM JDK 5.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467396
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-98:
-
IBM has indicated that the fix will be available in SR5 for JDK 5. I'm st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-108.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
Since this looks to be a duplicate of OPENJ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467394
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-107:
--
George,
I think Marc is right. What version of the IBM JDK are you run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12466068
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-98:
-
This looks to be a problem with the IBM JDK. I reported the problem to IB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-103.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The processing in the XMLPersistenceMetaDataParser.startSystemElement method
Default Listeners not being processed correctly
---
Key: OPENJPA-103
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-103
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jpa
Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463755
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-98:
-
We're thinking along the same lines... The super.loadClass just ends up i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463732
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-98:
-
Yes, I already did that printf thing. It varies on exactly which class is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463636
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-98:
-
I'll take ownership of this report (for now, at least).
I can now reprodu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-98:
---
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> Java deadlock when insert in t1 and find in t2 when using IBM JVM 1.
Runtime Enhancement without entries in persistence.xml fails while
attempting to process non-Entity classes
---
Key: OPENJPA-97
URL: https://issues.ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter closed OPENJPA-24.
---
Housecleaning...
> Allow OpenJPA to be extensible
> --
>
> K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter closed OPENJPA-41.
---
Housecleaning...
> transforming classes doesn't work
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter closed OPENJPA-63.
---
> Better pessimistic lock support for DB2 v8.2+
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter closed OPENJPA-96.
---
> Runtime Enhancement only processes first persistence unit defined in
> persistence.xml
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-96.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
This is a dup of OPENJPA-78. Not resolved yet, but the same problem is bei
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463337
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-96:
-
Looks like this is a duplicate of OPENJPA-78. I will close this one out.
Runtime Enhancement only processes first persistence unit defined in
persistence.xml
Key: OPENJPA-96
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-96
Project: O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462082
]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-95:
-
I just attached the three files (Agent, Guid, and ManagedElement) used to
@IdClass annotation for id field type of byte[]
---
Key: OPENJPA-95
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-95
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jdbc
Enviro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-95:
Attachment: ManagedElement.java
Guid.java
Agent.java
> @IdClass ann
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-77?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-77.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Kevin Sutter (was: David Wisneski)
Catalina provided a patch to me to check out. The changes looked good and the
regressi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-77?page=comments#action_12461393 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-77:
-
Catalina has provided a new private patch for this Issue which does not
introduce the multiple database dictionaries for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-91?page=comments#action_12461200 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-91:
-
Not sure if this is the same problem or not, but we're hitting a similar
problem when attempting to re-load an applicati
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-63.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I finally got around to verifying Igor's latest patch. It looks good and tests
out okay on my system. Thanks for your patience, Igor.
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-63:
---
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> Better pessimistic lock support for DB2 v8.2+
> -
>
> Key: OPENJPA-63
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12448584 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-63:
-
Thanks, Igor, for your comments. I agree with you (and Patrick) that a general
case solution is better than nothing at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12447595 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-63:
-
A couple of items with this issue...
o Using the SELECT "FOR READ ONLY WITH RS USE AND KEEP EXCLUSIVE LOCKS" syntax
fo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-67?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-67.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Updated the DB2 Dictionary with the proper DB2 statements.
> Bug with creating a named Sequence Generator for DB2
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12445193 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-63:
-
After requesting a vote via the dev mailing list, we've determined that we're
not going to worry about supporting the ba
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-67?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-67:
Description:
We discovered that the usage of a named Sequence Generator with DB2 doesn't
work as expected:
@Entity
@Table(name="ORDEREJB")
public class OrderE
Bug with creating a named Sequence Generator for DB2
Key: OPENJPA-67
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-67
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jdbc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_12444315 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-63:
-
I was just taking a look at Igor's patch and it looks rather straight-forward.
But, my general question is how do we (O
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-63:
Summary: Better pessimistic lock support for DB2 v8.2+ (was: Better
pissimistic lock support for DB2 v8.2+)
> Better pessimistic lock support for DB2 v8.2+
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-61?page=comments#action_12443882 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-61:
-
Question: From a pure JPA perspective, you would need WebSphere v6.1
Application Server in order to use OpenJPA within
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-61?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter reassigned OPENJPA-61:
---
Assignee: Kevin Sutter
> Missing usage of TransactionSynchronizationRegistry
> ---
>
> Key
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-61?page=comments#action_12443877 ]
Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-61:
-
It's turning out that we have two problems to resolve via this defect. The
first (more immediate) problem is to remove
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-24?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-24.
-
Resolution: Fixed
With Pinaki's and Abe's assistance, this JIRA report was resolved. Thank you.
> Allow OpenJPA to be extensible
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-65?page=all ]
Kevin Sutter updated OPENJPA-65:
Comment: was deleted
> Remove zip files from zip archive and remove "-all" from
> openjpa-all-${version}.jar
>
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo