+1 ...because of the compliance reasons you outlined.
Michael Dick wrote:
+1
On 2/10/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
> that is used by glassfi
+1
On 2/10/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
> that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything
> done through official channel
+1
On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything
done through official channels.
Craig
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
+1
My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything
done through official channels.
Craig
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against
+1
The Geronimo API is verified using the official Jee5 signatures file.
-dain
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence
+1
Either move to the Geronimo version or get the dev.java version updated.
Either way, just so that we're using a spec-compliant version of the API.
Thanks!
Kevin
On 2/8/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from
+1
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the
final version of the spec: there are some
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the
final version of the spec: there are some minor (and binary-
compatible) changes (some annotations do
