sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-vm-tools-discuss
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
--
___
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:58:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> You can always build your own version of glib library and compile against it.
> This is what we do internally so that tools work with older guests.
Something worth considering. Thanks!
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
--
Br
ted with the commercial release cannot be
redistributed. (There are only two I'm interested in, but none
of them are available for our use.)
So, I'm SOL, it seems.
Thanks, everyone, for your feedback on this matter.
--
Br
, and have run
into the issues cited in this thread.
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
--
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpo
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:17:25PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 07.03.2013 21:07, schrieb Brian Reichert:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> for RHEL you find binary RPMS and even yum-repos fro the VMware-Tools
> >>
e.com/tools/esx/5.0u2/rhel5/x86_64/index.html
These are not open source, and there is no corresponding source
code available for them.
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
--
Sy
group_id=204462&atid=989708
The latter sums it up: "Looks like GRegex introduced in glib2 >=
2.14 while RHEL5 and CentOS 5 use glib2 2.12."
Is there an earlier version of open-vm-tools that does not depend
on Gregex?
--
Brian Reichert
