On 06/12/2009 05:23 PM, Erich Neuwirth wrote:
> I was able to compile and install the complete set of tool on Fedora 11.
> There is 1 problem remaining.
> According to the docs a vmblock should be installed as a kernel module
> and it should be visible in /proc/fs/vmblock containing 2 nodes dev and
On 05/18/2009 09:51 AM, Olivier LAHAYE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to install modules as dkms tree in order to avoid recompiling the
> modules from the full source tree.
> Is there a clean way to create the-only source-tree from the full
> sources or should I do it myself by hand (so I can move it to
Hi,
i'm seeing a vmhgfs compile failure on 2.6.28 rc8 :
mhgfs/page.c:88: error: unknown field 'prepare_write' specified in
initializer
vmhgfs/page.c:89: error: unknown field 'commit_write' specified in
initializer
Does anyone already have a patch for this ?
Also, what is the current way to
We noticed that clicking on the Help button of the vmware toolbox
generates an error message. Looking at the code, it expects
documentation to live in /usr/lib/vmawre-tools/hlp, but the tarball
doesn't seem to include any...
--
Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> So it seems to imply that what controls the license version and that other
> versions are allowed is the copyright header in each source file; I checked
> and
> all sources seem to say "no later version", so unless I'm misinterpreting the
> LGPL text, I don't think there
What license are the tools (not the kernel modules) written with ?
There are a number of copies of COPYING containing the LGPLv2+ (i.e. "or
any later version"), while the source code mentions LGPLv2 (i.e. "no
later version")...
-denis
---
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is not the right list, but the problem might come up later
> in the open-vm-tools as well.
>
> I'm trying to make a VMware Workstation 6.5 start on a 2.6.27 kernel.
For the record, I have no problem here with Workstation 6.5 (build
118166) on F
