[Open64-devel] Fwd: A found bug and the fix

I doubt Open64 has the same bug. Thanks. -- Forwarded message -- From: Hucheng Zhou Date: Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:45 AM Subject: A found bug and the fix To: path64-...@lists.pathscale.com Hi: During the feedback optimization, I found a bug in WN_lower.cxx: The symptom is t

Re: [Open64-devel] Proposal for phase componentization

Min Zhao wrote: > > Thanks everyone who reviewed the proposal. It seems not much > objection. We are going to implement the work as proposed and send out > for review when it is ready. Was the amount of work to change WHIRL itself to being SSA ever considered? I wonder how many man years of t

Re: [Open64-devel] Proposal for phase componentization

Min Zhao wrote: > > > 2010/10/18 "C. Bergström" > > > Min Zhao wrote: > > Thanks everyone who reviewed the proposal. It seems not much > objection. We are going to implement the work as proposed and > send out for review when it is read

Re: [Open64-devel] Proposal for phase componentization

2010/10/18 "C. Bergström" > Min Zhao wrote: > >> Thanks everyone who reviewed the proposal. It seems not much objection. >> We are going to implement the work as proposed and send out for review when >> it is ready. >> > Was the amount of work to change WHIRL itself to being SSA ever considered?

Re: [Open64-devel] Proposal for phase componentization

Thanks everyone who reviewed the proposal. It seems not much objection. We are going to implement the work as proposed and send out for review when it is ready. Regards, Min 2010/10/11 Sun Chan > would you care to share your experimental patch such that we can come > up with the most appropria