Thx!
Gatekeepers are supposed to ask for origin of code from now on.
Sun
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
> I developed the change.
>
> I'll say in the bug report comment associated with the attachment for the
> patch if it came elsewhere, and updates to the copyright notice
I developed the change.
I'll say in the bug report comment associated with the attachment for the patch
if it came elsewhere, and updates to the copyright notices will indicate the
source.
Also when a patch comes from elsewhere, my commit log message will identify the
source.
Doug
> -O
is this code from somewhere else?
Sun
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
> I read the patch and it looks fine to me.
>
> 2010/11/18 Gilmore, Doug
>>
>> The bug fix is attached to the bug:
>>
>> https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=686
>>
>> Could someone review this patch wh
I read the patch and it looks fine to me.
2010/11/18 Gilmore, Doug
> The bug fix is attached to the bug:
>
> https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=686
>
> Could someone review this patch when they have the chance?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> -
Is the struct size 0 for the SL case too.
Murthy
-Original Message-
From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:28 PM
To: 朱庆; Gang Yu
Cc: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] review request for missing .setion .bss in cgemit
G
ok. So this is something introduced no in the original code.
Pls check in. However, your print string does not need an extra '\n'
in front and should not.
Sun
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:41 PM, 朱庆 wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Can gatekeeper help review this fix?
>
> Case a.c:
> struct line { char a[0];};
