Re: [Open64-devel] Request for Code Review: bug #707

2011-02-07 Thread Sun Chan
I guess I didn't make myself clear. Can you please explain your example in more detail? The original one, not traces. I don't fully understand your example. Sun On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Feng Zhou wrote: > Sun, > > For bug #707, the symptom is compile-time assertion: > ### Assertion failure

Re: [Open64-devel] Code Review Request (bug #721)

2011-02-07 Thread Sun Chan
I think you are in the wrong track. I'd like to know the symbol attribute of the string that became part of the erronous code. The bug is not in IPA, nor the CPIC/PIC flag themselves. Those are concepts that, if turned off, of course a lot of things will start working, because you basically turned

Re: [Open64-devel] Code Review Request (bug #721)

2011-02-07 Thread Feng Zhou
Sun, Based on your email, I changed my fix to the following (also as attachment): Index: osprey/common/com/config.cxx === --- osprey/common/com/config.cxx(revision 3471) +++ osprey/common/com/config.cxx(working copy)

Re: [Open64-devel] Request for Code Review: bug #707

2011-02-07 Thread Feng Zhou
Sun, For bug #707, the symptom is compile-time assertion: ### Assertion failure at line 921 of /wsp/fzhou/open64/dbg-objdir/osprey/../../open64/osprey/be/opt/opt_verify.cxx: ### Compiler Error in file test.c during Global Optimization -- Verify Live-Range phase: ### sym8v2(cr13) live range overlap